Michigan Court Grants 2 Pro-Life Groups Injunction Against Civil Rights Act
Updated
Updated · Bloomberg Law · Jul 27
Michigan Court Grants 2 Pro-Life Groups Injunction Against Civil Rights Act
2 articles · Updated · Bloomberg Law · Jul 27
Summary
A Michigan federal judge blocked enforcement of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act against Right to Life of Michigan and Pregnancy Resource Center while their constitutional challenge proceeds.
The court also denied Michigan officials' motions to dismiss, finding both groups had standing and were likely to succeed on their expressive-association claims.
The ruling said the law could force the organizations to hire employees with pro-choice views, undermining missions they argue are protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Why did a federal judge pause Michigan’s pregnancy-discrimination amendment for two advocacy groups, and could that exception spread to other nonprofits?
If hiring becomes part of protected expression, where should courts draw the line between mission-driven identity and employee civil-rights protections?