Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Jul 27
Stuart Heritage Reassesses 1997 Hallmark Odyssey After Joyce Carol Oates Sparks Revival
Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Jul 27

Stuart Heritage Reassesses 1997 Hallmark Odyssey After Joyce Carol Oates Sparks Revival

2 articles · Updated · The Guardian · Jul 27

Summary

  • Joyce Carol Oates’s enthusiastic tweets about the 1997 Hallmark Channel adaptation have pushed the two-part Odyssey back into circulation, prompting Stuart Heritage to revisit it against Christopher Nolan’s newer film.
  • Heritage says the 4-hour miniseries still stands out for its scale and cast — including Armand Assante, Greta Scacchi, Christopher Lee and Isabella Rossellini — but now looks unmistakably like 1990s television.
  • He argues the production’s biggest weakness is its handling of the gods, singling out Hermes’s green-screen flights and other effects as so awkward they help explain why Nolan largely stripped deities from his version.
  • That reassessment cuts against Oates’s praise for the Hallmark film’s Circe scene, Hades sequence and broader scope, and also against many 1997 reviews that dismissed it as clumsy, comic-bookish or outright awful.
  • Heritage’s verdict is that the older adaptation remains a strange, ambitious curiosity with more room for Homer than Nolan’s film, but far less intensity, spectacle and staying power.

Insights

Why is a once-mocked 1997 TV Odyssey suddenly stealing attention from Christopher Nolan’s epic before it even arrives?
Can a cheap-looking but more faithful Odyssey outshine a polished modern epic by embracing Homer’s gods, violence, and excess?