Updated
Updated · Tom's Guide · Jul 27
Fitbit Air Beats Garmin Cirqa in 7,000-Step Test as $99 Tracker Tops $199 Rival
Updated
Updated · Tom's Guide · Jul 27

Fitbit Air Beats Garmin Cirqa in 7,000-Step Test as $99 Tracker Tops $199 Rival

3 articles · Updated · Tom's Guide · Jul 27

Summary

  • A 7,000-step walk test found the Fitbit Air missed the manual count by just 10 steps, while the Garmin Cirqa overcounted by 70.
  • Dan Bracaglia manually tallied every 100 steps over about an hour in Seattle, with Strava on an iPhone 16 Plus serving as a control that also finished 10 steps high.
  • The Fitbit Air also matched Strava’s 3.86-mile distance, but its elevation reading came in at 236 feet versus Strava’s 405 feet, extending earlier concerns about climb accuracy.
  • Garmin’s Cirqa failed to log distance, climb or pace because the workout was recorded as a generic session rather than an outdoor walk, limiting the comparison beyond step counts.
  • Heart-rate results were inconclusive without control data, though the test follows an earlier 4,000-step comparison that also gave Fitbit Air a narrow edge.

Insights

Does spending double on a fitness tracker actually guarantee worse step accuracy in real-world testing?
Why did a premium screen-free wearable completely fail to log distance during a standard outdoor walk?
Are screenless trackers truly reducing digital fatigue, or just forcing users to check their smartphones more often?