Updated
Updated · Financial Times · Jul 29
Developing Nations Face Harder Export Path as US Targets 16 Economies and EU Expands CBAM
Updated
Updated · Financial Times · Jul 29

Developing Nations Face Harder Export Path as US Targets 16 Economies and EU Expands CBAM

2 articles · Updated · Financial Times · Jul 29

Summary

  • US preliminary duties on Indian solar cells and a new petition against Ethiopia highlight a broader squeeze on developing-country access to rich consumer markets, undermining export-led industrialisation as a route out of poverty.
  • Washington’s shift goes beyond classic rule-breaking cases: after a court struck down broad emergency tariffs in February, it turned to other tools, including Section 301 probes into “structural excess capacity” across 16 export-oriented economies.
  • The tougher stance is spreading. Biden-era metals cases and IRA sourcing rules already pointed the same way, while the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism adds a new cost hurdle for carbon-intensive imports from countries such as India and South Africa.
  • China offers only partial relief: it has granted zero-tariff treatment to 53 African countries, but its manufacturers still dominate many low-end sectors, limiting poorer countries’ ability to gain share in third markets or at home.
  • Regional trade blocs such as Africa’s 54-country AfCFTA and Asia’s RCEP, along with harder bargaining over minerals, ports and market access, may offer alternatives as the old rules-based export ladder narrows.

Insights

If rich countries close their markets with tariffs, labor rules, and carbon fees, can poor countries still climb the export ladder to prosperity?
If China dominates low-cost manufacturing and Western markets grow harder to enter, what development path is left for poorer exporters?
Are U.S. solar tariffs and the EU carbon border rule protecting fair competition, or shutting late-developing economies out of industrial growth?