Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Jul 30
Anthea Hartig Faces 1 Congressional Panel Over Smithsonian 'Political Activism' Claims
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Jul 30

Anthea Hartig Faces 1 Congressional Panel Over Smithsonian 'Political Activism' Claims

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Jul 30

Summary

  • Anthea M. Hartig testified before a congressional panel after a White House report accused the National Museum of American History of downplaying the founders and promoting “extreme political activism.”
  • Republican lawmakers used the report to press Hartig on who authorized the museum’s direction, with one member also attacking an exhibition on girlhood for exploring identity issues.
  • Kim Sajet, who resigned last year after Trump sought her firing from the National Portrait Gallery, said Hartig’s treatment looked like another “witch hunt” against a Smithsonian director.
  • The clash extends a broader Republican campaign against alleged “woke ideology” at the Smithsonian, even as the institution has asserted its independence from direct White House control.

Insights

Who should decide whether the Smithsonian’s history is balanced: scholars, government reviewers, or the visiting public?
What do the Smithsonian’s 250th-anniversary exhibits reveal about the larger fight over how America remembers itself?