Updated

Updated · TESLARATI · Jul 31

Tesla FSD v14.3.7 Averts Crash in 90-Mile Test as Review Flags Fixes Over v14.3.6

Updated

Updated · TESLARATI · Jul 31

Tesla FSD v14.3.7 Averts Crash in 90-Mile Test as Review Flags Fixes Over v14.3.6

Q: What hidden aerodynamic benefits prompted Tesla to secretly swap the Cybertruck's underbody panels from aluminum to carbon fiber?

Tesla’s hidden aerodynamic gain was cleaner underbody airflow. By switching from stamped aluminum to carbon fiber, Tesla could mold the panels more precisely around bolts and mounting points, smoothing contours that aluminum could not shape as well. That matters because the underside of a vehicle is a major source of turbulence at speed. Smoother panel geometry reduces disturbed airflow under the truck, which slightly lowers drag and improves efficiency. Cybertruck engineer Wes Morrill said the carbon fiber panels allow “better form[ing] the areas around the bolts to keep the underbody airflow cleaner than what stamped aluminum allows.” The benefit appears modest rather than dramatic. Tesla described it as a slight efficiency improvement, not a major range breakthrough. But it fits Tesla’s pattern of making running production changes that stack small gains in drag, weight, durability, and cost. The swap also brought non-aero advantages that helped justify the change: testing showed the carbon fiber panels were more durable, lighter, and cheaper than the aluminum parts. In practical terms, Tesla appears to have found a material that not only protects the underbody better, but also lets engineers create a smoother underside for a small aerodynamic edge.

2 articles · Updated · TESLARATI · Jul 31

Within 40 minutes of a 90-mile test, Tesla’s FSD v14.3.7 swerved to avoid a Dodge Charger that moved into the lane without checking, with the driver then braking and correcting to miss the curb.
The reviewer said v14.3.7 fixed key problems seen in v14.3.6, notably brake-stabbing, wheel-jerking and hesitation, making the system feel more confident in normal driving.
Manual turn-signal overrides were more responsive and parking-lot behavior remained strong, two areas the tester highlighted as meaningful usability gains.
Problems still cited include poor handling of major road bumps, occasionally illogical navigation that prompts disabling online routing, and unreliable auto wipers.
The account is an early hands-on review rather than Tesla safety data, but it adds to scrutiny of how quickly supervised driver-assistance software improves between releases.

Sources

TESLARATI24d ago

Tesla FSD v14.3.7 Averts Accident with Unsafe Dodge Charger Driver

TESLARATI22d ago

Tesla Full Self-Driving v14.3.7 early review: FSD saved me from an accident

Could Lemonade’s massive insurance discount for FSD driving completely revolutionize how the auto industry prices risk for semi-autonomous vehicles?

What hidden aerodynamic benefits prompted Tesla to secretly swap the Cybertruck's underbody panels from aluminum to carbon fiber?

Why is Tesla offering such aggressive promotional bundles if the new Model Y L is already nearly sold out in the US?

Sources

2 total

TESLARATI24d ago

Tesla FSD v14.3.7 Averts Accident with Unsafe Dodge Charger Driver

TESLARATI22d ago

Tesla Full Self-Driving v14.3.7 early review: FSD saved me from an accident

Tesla FSD v14.3.7 Averts Crash in 90-Mile Test as Review Flags Fixes Over v14.3.6

Summary

Sources

Insights

Related Stories

Sources

Related Stories