Updated
Updated · Electrek · Aug 3
Idaho Shooting Spurs $299 EVject Debate as Tesla Once Flagged Breakaway Charger as Fire Risk
Updated
Updated · Electrek · Aug 3

Idaho Shooting Spurs $299 EVject Debate as Tesla Once Flagged Breakaway Charger as Fire Risk

3 articles · Updated · Electrek · Aug 3

Summary

  • Three people were killed and several injured after an Aug. 1 shooting at a Twin Falls, Idaho, In-N-Out with a Tesla Supercharger, pushing EV owners to debate how drivers can flee while plugged in.
  • A charging car cannot simply drive away because the connector locks during active charging; Tesla owners on X quickly promoted EVject’s $299 Escape Connector, which is designed to break away if the driver accelerates.
  • Tesla sued over the accessory in 2024, alleging it could hit 100°C after 30 minutes of high-current charging and lacked over-temperature protection, though EVject later updated the product and Tesla dropped the case.
  • The report argues the adapter is not a true fix because it still requires drivers to recognize danger and react in time, risking a false sense of security in a sudden attack.
  • Because NACS, CCS and J1772 all lock plugs during charging, the broader solution would be a built-in emergency disconnect that safely cuts power and releases the latch from the driver’s seat.

Insights

Will automakers redesign EV chargers for human escape, or does electrical safety still outweigh personal security?
Could the very safety lock designed to protect your EV trap you inside during a life-threatening emergency?