Updated
Updated · The Conversation · Aug 7
Australia Seeks Urgent Review of A$89 Camera Glasses as Privacy Laws Face New Test
Updated
Updated · The Conversation · Aug 7

Australia Seeks Urgent Review of A$89 Camera Glasses as Privacy Laws Face New Test

3 articles · Updated · The Conversation · Aug 7

Summary

  • Attorney-General Michelle Rowland on Friday asked Australia’s privacy commissioner to urgently review smart glasses after Kmart’s A$89 Anko camera glasses quickly sold out.
  • The concern is that low-cost glasses can discreetly record video, photos and audio, then transfer that material to phone apps for editing, sharing and possible wider data use.
  • Current federal privacy law largely governs organizations, not individual wearers, leaving gaps around covert filming of bystanders even as apps and platforms handling the data may still be covered.
  • Other laws could still apply in serious cases, including state surveillance rules on recording conversations, the federal anti-doxxing offense and eSafety powers to seek harmful content taken down.
  • The review lands as cheaper wearables push recording into everyday public spaces, intensifying calls for privacy-by-design rules rather than relying on individuals to police the technology.

Insights

Could cheap smart glasses secretly recording your every move force a total rewrite of public privacy laws?
If users easily disable privacy lights on wearables, is the concept of public anonymity already dead?