Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Aug 8
NYT Columnist Questions Political 'Enemy' After 17 Years of Targeting Obama-Era Elite Consensus
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Aug 8

NYT Columnist Questions Political 'Enemy' After 17 Years of Targeting Obama-Era Elite Consensus

1 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Aug 8

Summary

  • Seventeen years after joining The New York Times, the columnist says he is no longer sure who his main political "enemy" should be.
  • For years, he cast the early Obama-era elite consensus as that target—a left-leaning, technocratic worldview shared across parts of Democratic, Silicon Valley and establishment Republican circles.
  • He says his critique was both substantive and strategic, citing differences over religion, abortion, immigration, marijuana legalization and the Middle East, while rejecting Republican pressure to adapt to that consensus.
  • The essay argues that elite critics were necessary because the consensus, in his view, was prone to overreach and too confident in meritocratic management of a globalizing world.

Insights

When faith in elite expertise fades, what new moral framework should guide politics, technology, and public trust?
If the old consensus has cracked, who now shapes power—and how should societies hold them accountable?
Is today’s AI boom repeating the same technocratic overconfidence once blamed for political and cultural overreach?