Updated
Updated · ProMarket · Aug 10
Shishene Jing Proposes 3-Factor Labor Maverick Test for Mergers
Updated
Updated · ProMarket · Aug 10

Shishene Jing Proposes 3-Factor Labor Maverick Test for Mergers

1 articles · Updated · ProMarket · Aug 10

Summary

  • Jing argues merger review should identify “labor market mavericks” — employers whose pay, hiring or training practices keep wage competition alive and whose loss could depress wages and benefits.
  • The proposed 3-factor test asks whether a firm consistently pays above-market wages, expands workers’ outside options through mobility-friendly practices, and invests in training that lifts the broader labor market.
  • The framework targets a gap in current enforcement: labor analysis is recognized in the 2023 Merger Guidelines, but regulators still rely heavily on HHI concentration measures that treat firms as interchangeable.
  • Jing says remedies should also change, because divestitures cannot transfer a maverick employer’s compensation culture or training commitments; in some cases, blocking a deal or imposing wage-floor and noncompete limits may work better.
  • Examples cited include the DOJ’s 2022 Penguin Random House-Simon & Schuster challenge and studies showing private-equity hospital acquisitions cut salary spending 16.6%, underscoring broader antitrust concern over labor-market monopsony.

Insights

If regulators block mergers to protect high-paying employers, will everyday consumers ultimately pay the price for these protected labor markets?
How can the government legally force a newly merged corporation to maintain a unique, pro-worker corporate culture when traditional divestitures fail?