Updated
Updated · WIRED · Aug 12
Ruby Thelot Says 25% of 1,000 Viral Dating Videos Were Negative as AI Hype Warps Trend Metrics
Updated
Updated · WIRED · Aug 12

Ruby Thelot Says 25% of 1,000 Viral Dating Videos Were Negative as AI Hype Warps Trend Metrics

1 articles · Updated · WIRED · Aug 12

Summary

  • WIRED’s interview with NYU researcher Ruby Thelot argues virality is no longer a reliable gauge of cultural relevance because platforms now optimize content for views rather than lasting value.
  • Goodhart’s law helps explain that shift, he said: once virality became the target, creators learned to engineer attention that may never translate into mainstream adoption.
  • About 25% of roughly 1,000 Instagram and TikTok dating videos with more than 1 million views were negative, Thelot said, suggesting the “dating burnout” narrative is overstated.
  • Prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket look less like pure finance than participatory culture, he said, with betting serving as a way for young users to feel closer to media and each other.
  • On AI, Thelot rejected doomsday claims, arguing society’s bottlenecks are coordination and values—not intelligence alone—and warning that quantifying intelligence can sideline emotional, artistic and bodily forms of human capability.

Insights

If viral trends are just engineered illusions, what other major cultural shifts are entirely fabricated by algorithms?
If billions in prediction markets are just social bonding, are we mistaking collective gambling for genuine cultural movements?
Could the obsession with artificial intelligence actually be destroying the emotional and social skills humans need to survive?