Updated
Updated · MIT Technology Review · Aug 17
Flock Tightens 120,000-Camera Search Rules After 50 Misuse Cases as Loopholes Persist
Updated
Updated · MIT Technology Review · Aug 17

Flock Tightens 120,000-Camera Search Rules After 50 Misuse Cases as Loopholes Persist

3 articles · Updated · MIT Technology Review · Aug 17

Summary

  • Flock said officers must now enter a criminal case number for license-plate searches and will face software checks for abnormal activity after 50 documented misuse cases, including stalking and harassment.
  • The new controls still leave major gaps: Flock told MIT Technology Review it does not verify case numbers, meaning officers can enter bogus ones and potentially evade the safeguard.
  • 90% of searches occur within a week of an incident, yet agencies can still retain and share plate-reader data for months or years across Flock’s nationwide network, fueling criticism that the system enables mass surveillance.
  • An $8 billion company under growing backlash, Flock has already seen some cities cancel contracts while states weigh limits or bans, raising pressure for narrower rules or new laws.

Insights

If Flock hides officer names in audit logs, how can the public verify that rogue cops aren't still using the network for stalking?
Will forcing police to enter a case number stop surveillance abuse, or simply teach rogue officers how to fake their digital paperwork?
As citizens map over 128,000 hidden cameras, will these new automated audits be enough to stop cities from canceling their surveillance contracts?