Updated
Updated · Fox News · Aug 15
New York Magazine Drops Ross Barkan, Revises 67 Columns After Plagiarism Review
Updated
Updated · Fox News · Aug 15

New York Magazine Drops Ross Barkan, Revises 67 Columns After Plagiarism Review

3 articles · Updated · Fox News · Aug 15

Summary

  • New York Magazine said Friday it will no longer publish Ross Barkan’s column after an independent editorial review found attribution failures across 67 pieces.
  • The magazine said those columns were updated to add proper attribution of language, information and sourcing, and it apologized to writers whose work was not properly credited.
  • The review followed a May accusation by Washington Post reporter Drew Harwell that Barkan lifted material in a column about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire; NPR later identified additional similar passages tied to other outlets.
  • Barkan, who had initially denied plagiarizing anyone, said he should have been more careful with citation across nearly 250 pieces, apologized for the errors and said he plans to launch a new column in September.

Insights

How did dozens of attribution errors slip past top editors before public call-outs forced their hand?
What hidden pressures in digital journalism are blurring the line between standard aggregation and career-ending plagiarism?
Will this high-profile firing permanently damage the columnist's career, or is media redemption just a new platform away?