Russia Jails Lev Shlosberg for 11 Years, Upholds Yabloko Election Ban
Updated
Updated · Al Jazeera English · Aug 17
Russia Jails Lev Shlosberg for 11 Years, Upholds Yabloko Election Ban
3 articles · Updated · Al Jazeera English · Aug 17
Summary
An 11-year, one-month penal-colony sentence was handed to Yabloko deputy leader Lev Shlosberg on the same day Russia’s Supreme Court rejected the party’s appeal against its election ban.
The court said Shlosberg had harmed the reputation of Russia’s armed forces and spread falsehoods about the war, using laws introduced after the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Yabloko said the ruling leaves September’s parliamentary vote without the only registered party openly calling for an end to the war, and vowed to seek a further supervisory review.
Dozens of supporters and journalists were detained outside the court, with party officials calling the police action intimidation.
The twin rulings deepen a broader crackdown that critics say is erasing legal anti-war opposition and further narrowing Russia’s electoral space.
How did a Russian politician receive an 11-year prison sentence for statements that were actually made by someone else?
With Russia's last legal anti-war party banned from the ballot, how will suppressed citizens express their dissent moving forward?
Why did hundreds of protesters carrying apples face police detention outside a Russian court during a high-stakes election hearing?
The End of Legal Opposition: Yabloko’s Ban and Lev Shlosberg’s 11-Year Sentence Signal Russia’s Descent into Authoritarianism
Overview
On August 17, 2026, Russia delivered a decisive blow to legal opposition by sentencing Lev Shlosberg, Yabloko’s deputy chairman, to over 11 years in prison for his anti-war stance and barring the Yabloko party from the upcoming parliamentary elections. This crackdown followed Yabloko’s surge in popularity after its registration, as its peace platform resonated with millions of Russians seeking an end to the conflict. The Kremlin, fearing a strong anti-war vote and declining support for President Putin, reversed its strategy and used legal and administrative harassment to dismantle Yabloko’s network, leaving millions of anti-war voters without representation and signaling a complete intolerance for dissent.