Updated
Updated · Forbes · Aug 17
Fifth Circuit Recasts 1977 Tax Exception, Redefining Limited Partner Test
Updated
Updated · Forbes · Aug 17

Fifth Circuit Recasts 1977 Tax Exception, Redefining Limited Partner Test

1 articles · Updated · Forbes · Aug 17

Summary

  • Aug. 12 brought a rare appellate reversal: the Fifth Circuit withdrew its January opinion and replaced it with a new rule for the section 1402(a)(13) self-employment tax exception.
  • The substitute opinion says a limited partner is one who plays no significant role in managing or running the business, abandoning January’s bright-line focus on state-law limited-partner status and limited liability.
  • The panel acted after the government sought rehearing, then vacated the Tax Court’s decision and sent the case back to apply the new management-based standard.
  • The new test still rejects the Tax Court’s passive-investor approach in Soroban, but offers little guidance on what counts as a significant management role or how dual-capacity partners should be treated.
  • Because the ruling binds Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, it reshapes planning in the Fifth Circuit while leaving a broader circuit split possible as appeals proceed in the First and Second Circuits.

Insights

Will a vague new tax ruling force private equity and hedge fund managers to completely restructure their businesses?
With a major circuit split looming, how will courts define significant management before taxpayers face hefty penalties?
Could an undefined legal standard from 1977 trigger a massive wave of IRS audits for modern LLC owners?