Updated
Updated · Hollywood Reporter · Aug 19
California AG Bonta Calls Ellison Desperate in $2 Billion Paramount-Warner Merger Fight
Updated
Updated · Hollywood Reporter · Aug 19

California AG Bonta Calls Ellison Desperate in $2 Billion Paramount-Warner Merger Fight

3 articles · Updated · Hollywood Reporter · Aug 19

Summary

  • Rob Bonta said David Ellison is "desperate" and "grasping at straws," dismissing Paramount’s latest bid to make taxpayers cover nearly $2 billion in ticking-fee exposure tied to the Warner Bros. Discovery merger.
  • Bonta said the judge already rejected a bond request, that Paramount voluntarily accepted the fee structure and a delayed closing until 2027, and that Ellison’s threat to leave California would not weaken a lawsuit brought by 12 state attorneys general.
  • Settlement remains possible, he said, but only through structural remedies such as divesting assets or channel groups—not behavioral promises like Ellison’s floated commitment to release 30 theatrical films.
  • Bonta also brushed off Paramount’s public-relations campaign and recent calls for a settlement from IATSE, the DGA and Cinema United, arguing the case is a straightforward antitrust challenge and that time pressure is largely self-inflicted by the companies.
  • With a March trial looming, the interview underscored how the states are trying to keep leverage over a merger that could still face divestitures, mounting delay costs and a courtroom showdown.

Insights

With massive delay fees mounting, will Paramount's desperate threat to flee California force a last-minute Hollywood mega-merger settlement?
Why is a state coalition aggressively blocking a $110 billion media merger that the federal government already cleared?