Updated
Updated · LawyersandSettlements.com · Aug 19
Ninth Circuit Revives 3-Page ABM Arbitration Pact in California Wage Suit
Updated
Updated · LawyersandSettlements.com · Aug 19

Ninth Circuit Revives 3-Page ABM Arbitration Pact in California Wage Suit

1 articles · Updated · LawyersandSettlements.com · Aug 19

Summary

  • A Ninth Circuit panel reversed a district court ruling that had blocked ABM Aviation from enforcing an arbitration agreement against airport janitor Cocom in his California wage-and-hour class action.
  • The lower court had found the 3-page pact unconscionable because it was a take-it-or-leave-it hiring condition and Cocom was allegedly rushed through signing without a chance to negotiate or ask questions.
  • The appeals court instead held the agreement’s scope was limited to employment disputes, that limit effectively constrained its duration, and any lack of mutuality did not amount to substantive unconscionability.
  • The ruling strengthens ABM’s bid to push the August 2024 lawsuit out of court and into arbitration, while leaving open a broader California fight over how far adhesive employment contracts can restrict workers’ rights.

Insights

Why did a janitor's three-page contract spark a legal shift that could block thousands of California workers from joining class-action lawsuits?
Could a simple severability clause in your employment contract secretly strip away your right to sue your employer in open court?