Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Aug 20
Texas Custody Fight Erupts After Surrogate Refuses Abortion of Baby Born Aug. 12
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Aug 20

Texas Custody Fight Erupts After Surrogate Refuses Abortion of Baby Born Aug. 12

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Aug 20

Summary

  • A baby born Aug. 12 after an Alaska surrogate refused a requested abortion is now at the center of a Texas custody and medical-decision fight involving the intended California parents.
  • A 20-week scan found hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and McKenna West rejected a contract clause requiring termination if fetal abnormalities were diagnosed and the intended parents requested it.
  • West then left for Texas, where abortion has been nearly totally banned since 2022, after connecting with activist Lila Rose and lawyers from Alliance Defending Freedom; Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton later intervened.
  • Texas and California court orders have given Omar Ahmed and Nausheen Gilkar custody and medical authority, but they still cannot leave Texas for now and West is seeking custody.
  • The case has become a broader test of how weak U.S. surrogacy regulation collides with post-Roe abortion laws when contracts, consent and emergency neonatal care break down.

Insights

When a surrogate refuses termination, who truly owns the right to make life-or-death decisions for a critically ill newborn?
How does a cross-state legal battle over a newborn expose the dangerous loopholes in America's unregulated fertility industry?
Can a surrogacy contract dictate medical choices, or does the surrogate hold ultimate power over the intended parents' child?