Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Aug 25
OLC Memo Lets Private Advisers Defy Subpoenas, Expanding Executive Privilege Beyond 2019
Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Aug 25

OLC Memo Lets Private Advisers Defy Subpoenas, Expanding Executive Privilege Beyond 2019

3 articles · Updated · The Guardian · Aug 25

Summary

  • A new Office of Legal Counsel memo says private presidential advisers can refuse subpoenas by invoking the president’s executive privilege, extending protections beyond government officials.
  • That reading would make it harder for Congress and courts to compel testimony in investigations of presidential wrongdoing, because privilege claims can delay or stall proceedings even when later rejected.
  • The memo goes further than a 2019 OLC opinion used to back Don McGahn’s refusal to testify during the Mueller-era inquiry; courts ultimately forced movement only after years of litigation and a closed-door settlement.
  • Historical precedent cuts against the broader claim: courts rejected similar privilege bids by Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton and, in key respects, Thomas Jefferson when evidence or testimony was sought.
  • Commentators cited in the report say the timing may reflect preparation for future congressional investigations if the House or Senate changes hands, raising the stakes for executive accountability.

Insights

Will courts allow an unprecedented expansion of executive secrecy to shield private advisers from federal oversight investigations?
Could a private citizen's advice to the president unexpectedly drag their business into a high-stakes congressional subpoena battle?