Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Aug 28
Gila Bend Council Race Ends on 67-67 Card Draw Under Arizona Law
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Aug 28

Gila Bend Council Race Ends on 67-67 Card Draw Under Arizona Law

2 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Aug 28

Summary

  • Two Gila Bend Town Council candidates finished July’s election tied at 67 votes each, sending the race to a card draw Tuesday to determine the winner.
  • Arizona’s century-old law requires a game of chance when local races end in a tie; in this case, the candidate drawing the higher card from a shuffled deck claimed the seat.
  • Town officials in the 1,800-person community staged the tiebreaker as openly as possible, saying transparency mattered in a state roiled by election conspiracy theories.
  • The unusual finish is not unique: other deadlocked U.S. local races have recently been settled by poker games, straw draws and, in Hawaii this month, names pulled from plastic eggs.

Insights

What are the astonishing odds of a single local politician winning two separate tied elections purely through games of chance?
Will archaic tie-breaking laws relying on card draws finally push small municipalities to adopt modern ranked-choice voting systems?
Could a simple deck of cards be the ultimate unbiased judge, or does it undermine the foundation of democratic choice?