Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Aug 30
Munar Rallies From 2 Sets Down to Beat Atmane 7-5 in 5th as Cramp Row Erupts
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Aug 30

Munar Rallies From 2 Sets Down to Beat Atmane 7-5 in 5th as Cramp Row Erupts

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Aug 30

Summary

  • Jaume Munar completed a 6-7(5), 3-6, 6-1, 7-6(4), 7-5 comeback after Térence Atmane, leading by two sets and a break, was crippled by leg cramps in the first round.
  • At 2-1 in the fifth set, Atmane called for the trainer again, but treatment was refused after the evaluation because medical timeouts are not allowed for cramps; Atmane insisted repeatedly that it was pain, not cramp.
  • From 1-0, 40-40 in the third set, Atmane won only six points as he resorted to underarm and forehand serves, took delay penalties and a code violation, and struggled to move.
  • Munar repeatedly pressed the chair umpire to enforce rules on delays and coaching, saying he wanted warnings applied correctly, while confusion over cramp-treatment rules again became part of the match.
  • The episode echoed Carlos Alcaraz's cramp controversy at the 2026 Australian Open semifinals and highlighted how subjective evaluations leave players, officials and fans unclear on when treatment is permitted.

Insights

Could a controversial Grand Slam rule have cost a player his US Open victory by misdiagnosing a real injury as simple cramps?
How can sports officials accurately distinguish between routine fatigue cramps and serious muscle injuries during a high-stakes tennis match?
Is it ethical to deny an athlete medical treatment during a match based on subjective rules about cramping versus injury?