Updated
Updated · The Globe and Mail · Aug 31
Workers May Claim Social Security at 62 Despite Up to 30% Benefit Cuts
Updated
Updated · The Globe and Mail · Aug 31

Workers May Claim Social Security at 62 Despite Up to 30% Benefit Cuts

3 articles · Updated · The Globe and Mail · Aug 31

Summary

  • Three cases can make claiming Social Security at 62 the better choice despite lower monthly checks: poor health, shrinking savings, or helping a higher-earning spouse delay.
  • A worker with a full retirement age of 67 can see benefits cut by as much as 30% by filing at 62, while waiting can raise payments through avoided early-filing penalties and delayed retirement credits.
  • Poor health matters most for single retirees, because delaying only pays off if they live long enough to recoup forgone benefits; higher earners with spouses can still boost survivor benefits by waiting.
  • Tight finances can also force an early claim, especially for people pushed out of work by illness, caregiving, or weak job prospects, making reduced checks preferable to rapidly draining retirement accounts.
  • For couples, one spouse claiming at 62 can let the higher earner wait longer, increasing the household's larger future benefit and potentially allowing the lower earner to switch to spousal benefits later.

Insights

With a potential 2032 funding cliff approaching, could claiming Social Security at 62 actually protect your lifetime payout better than waiting?
Experts warn against filing at 62, but what hidden spousal strategy makes early claiming a highly profitable move for married couples?
How does the 2026 earnings limit secretly impact early Social Security claimants who still need to work part-time to survive?