Updated

Updated · CNBC · Sep 21

Unsealed OpenAI, Microsoft Statements Threaten Fair-Use Defense in NYT Suit as 4,400 Call Spreads Trade

Updated

Updated · CNBC · Sep 21

Unsealed OpenAI, Microsoft Statements Threaten Fair-Use Defense in NYT Suit as 4,400 Call Spreads Trade

Q: What secret settlement or ruling are Wall Street traders betting on following the sudden explosion in October options for the Times?

Traders are not betting on a known “secret” deal. The October call activity points to speculation on a near-term catalyst in the New York Times v. OpenAI/Microsoft case, most plausibly either a sizable settlement with licensing terms or a court ruling that strengthens the Times’ leverage. The strongest read from the filings is that investors see the newly unsealed evidence as raising pressure on OpenAI and Microsoft. The Times is arguing the documents hurt the defendants’ fair-use defense by suggesting large-scale copying, possible paywall circumvention, and direct competitive harm to publisher traffic. That has made a settlement scenario look more credible, potentially involving a cash payment, ongoing licensing, or both. The other event traders may be positioning for is an important pretrial ruling, especially on fair use, market harm, or the Times’ claims tied to alleged substitution of chatbot answers for visits to its site. A ruling favorable to the Times would likely improve its bargaining position even if it does not end the case. There is no public evidence of an actual undisclosed agreement or imminent announced ruling. The options flow reflects a market bet that something material could happen within weeks, not proof that traders know the outcome. The most likely thesis is simple: either OpenAI and Microsoft settle to contain legal and reputational risk, or the court issues a decision that materially boosts the Times’ chances of extracting a richer licensing deal.

3 articles · Updated · CNBC · Sep 21

Newly unsealed statements in The New York Times copyright case show OpenAI and Microsoft executives describing chatbots as a direct threat to journalism, undercutting a core fair-use argument that the products are not substitutes.
The filings reportedly include claims that OpenAI copied millions of copyrighted articles for training, that an employee found a way around the Times paywall, and that Microsoft’s Brent Hecht called the process “the largest theft of labor in human history.”
Those disclosures raised expectations of either a large settlement and licensing deal or a damaging trial loss for the defendants, with traders buying about 4,400 October 72.5/77.5 NYT call spreads on Friday.
A Sept. 1 Justice Department statement still complicates the case by urging the court to treat AI training on copyrighted works as fair use, arguing U.S. restrictions could hurt national-security competitiveness.

Sources

Left25%

Center50%

Right25%

CNBC2h ago

OpenAI, Microsoft Executives' Statements Undermine Fair-Use Defense in NYT Copyright Lawsuit

Reuters2h ago

OpenAI, Microsoft executives' quotes on AI training threaten copyright defense, news outlets argue | Reuters

Arab News2h ago

Arab News | OpenAI, Microsoft executives' quotes on AI training threaten copyright defense, news outlets argue

12 Sources

If AI executives privately admitted to bypassing paywalls, could this hidden evidence completely dismantle their multi-billion dollar fair use defense?

What secret settlement or ruling are Wall Street traders betting on following the sudden explosion in October options for the Times?

AI’s $1 Billion Copyright Crisis: The New York Times, OpenAI, and Microsoft Face Off Over Mass News Scraping and the Collapse of Journalism’s Business Model

Overview

In September 2026, unsealed documents in The New York Times’ lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI revealed that both companies secretly worried their AI products relied on massive, unauthorized copying of news articles. OpenAI researchers stripped copyright notices and even bypassed paywalls to access premium content. As AI chatbots began giving users direct answers instead of sending them to news sites, publishers suffered huge drops in web traffic and revenue. This triggered a 'doom loop,' where weakened publishers could no longer supply the high-quality data AI models need. The legal battle now threatens to upend the AI industry’s business model, with potential licensing costs likely to be passed on to users.

...