Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Sep 22
Kagan Rejects Bid to Block Custody Transfer in 3-State Surrogacy-Abortion Fight
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Sep 22

Kagan Rejects Bid to Block Custody Transfer in 3-State Surrogacy-Abortion Fight

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Sep 22

Summary

  • Justice Elena Kagan denied an emergency request to stop a ruling that gave custody of a baby to the biological parents, acting alone without referring the matter to the full Supreme Court.
  • The surrogate, McKenna West of Alaska, sought intervention after refusing an abortion when the fetus was diagnosed at about 20 weeks with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
  • West later traveled to Texas and gave birth over the initial objections of the California couple, Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, turning the dispute into a closely watched three-state legal battle.
  • The case has drawn national attention because it sits at the intersection of surrogacy contracts, abortion decisions and parental rights after a severe prenatal diagnosis.

Insights

When a surrogate defies a contract to save a pregnancy, who truly owns the right to make life-or-death decisions for the newborn?
If a cross-state legal battle erupts over a baby's survival, how do hospitals decide whose orders to follow?