Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Sep 25
Doctor Says AI Improves Care in 2026 but Weakens Medical Students' Learning
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Sep 25

Doctor Says AI Improves Care in 2026 but Weakens Medical Students' Learning

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Sep 25

Summary

  • A primary-care doctor says AI already makes him a better clinician, helping with antibiotic choices, unusual bloodwork, dizziness cases and treatment questions in daily practice.
  • OpenEvidence — a tool limited to health care providers — fills gaps in an ever-expanding body of medical facts, while the doctor says core skills like history-taking, reasoning and communication still remain human work.
  • Students and residents use the same system, but the doctor worries early reliance is leaving trainees with less memorized knowledge and a more passive relationship with clinical decision-making.
  • The essay argues medicine should not try to wall itself off from AI; instead, training in 2026 must teach future physicians to think critically with a machine in the loop.

Insights

Could relying on AI make future doctors more empathetic by freeing them from memorizing endless medical data?
If doctors lose diagnostic skills through AI reliance, who saves the patient when the technology inevitably fails?
Why are clinics rushing to adopt medical AI when trials show it barely improves actual patient recovery rates?