Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Sep 28
Justice Alito Recuses From Climate Case With Billions at Stake
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Sep 28

Justice Alito Recuses From Climate Case With Billions at Stake

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Sep 28

Summary

  • Justice Samuel Alito said Monday he will not participate in a major climate-change lawsuit set for Supreme Court arguments next week, in a one-sentence notice that gave no reason.
  • The recusal follows pressure from environmental and court-watchdog groups over Alito’s holdings in ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66 and his past private-jet trip with hedge fund manager Paul Singer, whose firm invests in Suncor.
  • The case could expose oil companies to billions of dollars in potential climate-damage liability and is the first matter on the court’s calendar when the justices return from their summer recess.
  • Supreme Court ethics rules adopted in November 2023 leave recusal decisions to individual justices and do not require them to explain why they step aside.

Insights

What does Alito’s unexplained step-aside reveal about Supreme Court ethics as a blockbuster climate case reaches argument?
Will Alito’s recusal turn Boulder’s climate lawsuit into a 4-4 Supreme Court split with nationwide consequences for oil companies?
Is the Suncor case really about local damages, or a backdoor fight over who controls climate liability in America’s courts?