Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Sep 29
Anthropic Hosts Dozens of Religious Scholars to Probe Claude's Morality and Consciousness
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Sep 29

Anthropic Hosts Dozens of Religious Scholars to Probe Claude's Morality and Consciousness

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Sep 29

Summary

  • Private meetings over recent months brought dozens of religious scholars to Anthropic, where executives discussed whether Claude shows human-like behavior, feelings and possibly consciousness.
  • Christopher Olah, a billionaire co-founder who leads work on why Claude behaves as it does, told participants the company is uncertain whether AI models are conscious but wants the right answer.
  • Anthropic required nondisclosure agreements and kept key parts of the conversations confidential, underscoring how sensitively it is handling questions about AI morality and inner experience.
  • An April dinner in San Francisco captured the effort: scholars said Anthropic leaders spoke about Claude as more than software, reflecting the company's broader push to instill moral reasoning into its models.

Insights

Why is a leading tech lab secretly asking religious scholars if their AI has a soul?
Could treating an artificial intelligence as a conscious being actually make it more dangerous?
If a machine develops a human-like cognitive workspace, does it suddenly deserve moral rights?