Updated
Updated · 24/7 Wall St. · Sep 29
Claiming Social Security at 62 Cuts Benefits to 70% as Taxes and Longevity Complicate Ramsey's Advice
Updated
Updated · 24/7 Wall St. · Sep 29

Claiming Social Security at 62 Cuts Benefits to 70% as Taxes and Longevity Complicate Ramsey's Advice

2 articles · Updated · 24/7 Wall St. · Sep 29

Summary

  • Workers born in 1960 or later who claim Social Security at 62 get 70% of their age-67 benefit, while waiting until 70 lifts payments to 124%—about $1,400 versus $2,480 on a $2,000 baseline.
  • Break-even math undercuts any one-size-fits-all rule: 62 versus 67 crosses near age 78 years 8 months, and 62 versus 70 near 80 years 4 months, before taxes, market returns and survivor benefits are added.
  • Taxes and Medicare can further weaken a claim-and-invest strategy, with up to 85% of benefits taxable above $34,000 in individual combined income and IRMAA surcharges starting at $109,000 of 2026 MAGI.
  • Work income adds another wrinkle: in 2026, benefits are withheld above $24,480 before full retirement age, though SSA later recalculates payments for months withheld under the earnings test.
  • For married couples and long-lived retirees, delaying can be more valuable because higher benefits can raise survivor income, even as Social Security's trust fund is projected to cover about 78% of scheduled retirement benefits after 2032 without congressional action.

Insights

Does claiming Social Security at 62 and investing it really beat waiting until 70 once taxes, Medicare premiums, and weak markets are included?
Why might delaying Social Security be the smarter move for married couples, even if early claiming looks better on paper?