Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Oct 9
Film NAZA Features 24 Israeli Soldiers Describing Gaza Killings as Collateral Damage
Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Oct 9

Film NAZA Features 24 Israeli Soldiers Describing Gaza Killings as Collateral Damage

3 articles · Updated · The Guardian · Oct 9

Summary

  • NAZA centers on interviews with 24 Israeli soldiers and intelligence officers who describe, in calm technical language, how Gaza targets were selected and civilians counted as acceptable “collateral damage.”
  • The documentary says approved civilian tolls rose with a target’s seniority, sometimes into the hundreds; one interviewee says applying a 20-person benchmark across tens of thousands of targets means “you end up with all of Gaza.”
  • Several participants describe the work as emotionally detached and even “insanely fun,” saying they focused on completing missions rather than the people inside bombed buildings, while one explicitly says Israel committed genocide in Gaza.
  • Produced by the Guardian, the film argues that modern mass killing depends not only on frontline brutality but on bureaucratic, technologically skilled operators working at a distance; it is now in UK and US cinemas, with screenings planned in more than 50 countries.

Insights

Can the psychological detachment of bureaucratized killing explain how operatives approved hundreds of civilian deaths without hesitation?
Why are elite intelligence officers risking everything to expose the dark secrets behind remote-controlled strikes?
How does a simple military acronym hide the chilling reality of AI-driven mass casualties in modern warfare?

Exposing "NAZA": How 24 Israeli Whistleblowers Unveiled AI-Driven Targeting, Civilian Casualties, and a Political Firestorm

Overview

In September 2026, the documentary 'NAZA' premiered to international acclaim, exposing how the Israeli military used advanced AI systems like 'The Gospel' and 'Lavender' to rapidly generate thousands of targets in Gaza, often accepting high civilian casualties. The film relied on testimonies from 24 anonymous Israeli insiders, whose identities were carefully protected by the filmmakers. The revelations sparked fierce backlash in Israel, with top officials threatening legal action and citizenship revocation, while far-right activists targeted the filmmakers and their families. Internationally, the film prompted calls for investigations and highlighted the risks of automation bias and the global spread of algorithmic warfare.

...