Updated
Updated · OpenAI · Oct 9
Asana Slashes Browser-Agent Costs 76x on GPT-6.1 Sol, Cutting Runtime 5x
Updated
Updated · OpenAI · Oct 9

Asana Slashes Browser-Agent Costs 76x on GPT-6.1 Sol, Cutting Runtime 5x

2 articles · Updated · OpenAI · Oct 9

Summary

  • $0.47 per run and about four minutes per task marked Asana’s optimized browser-agent workflow on GPT-6.1 Sol, down from at least $36.21 and 22.5 minutes on its original Model B setup.
  • A 144-run study found the gains came from extending caching to browsing history, raising the history budget to 480,000 characters, and trimming screenshots in batches instead of nearly every step.
  • On GPT-6.1 Sol alone, the new policy cut costs 4x from $1.97 to $0.47 because 89% of input tokens were served from cache at 5% of the uncached price.
  • Larger history also improved reliability: GPT-6.1 Sol produced correct answers in all 18 runs with the bigger budget, versus three of 18 with the smaller one.
  • GPT-6 Astra in Codex ran the experiments in about a week instead of an estimated one to two months, and Asana has already shipped the changes in StackAI while expanding agent-led product testing.

Insights

Could Asana's 76-fold cost reduction expose a fundamental flaw in how the tech industry currently builds autonomous AI agents?
How did a simple visual memory tweak turn a failing browser agent into a flawless, high-speed system?
If context architecture matters more than model size, are developers wasting millions on inefficient AI memory management?