Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Oct 13
Pocock Questions PM Office Vetting of AI Letter 35 Minutes Before It Was Sent
Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Oct 13

Pocock Questions PM Office Vetting of AI Letter 35 Minutes Before It Was Sent

1 articles · Updated · The Guardian · Oct 13

Summary

  • Notes seen by Guardian Australia show a senior Albanese adviser edited and appeared to approve parts of a bipartisan AI committee letter up to 8:55pm, just 35 minutes before it was sent to the prime minister.
  • David Pocock said he was asked for edits but only replied at 9:55pm, after the letter had already gone, and argued the process denied time for changes and suggested pre-vetting by the PM's office.
  • The letter flagged copyright, AI safeguards, sovereign capability and AI literacy, but Pocock said it missed concerns over creatives' rights, a datacentre levy, worker retraining and mandatory screening of genetic synthesis imports.
  • Jo Briskey said the committee consulted both Albanese's and Peter Dutton's offices to build cross-party support before its 30 November report, while Jonno Duniam denied any guidance or interference.
  • Pocock said the episode deepened fears the committee was serving a political purpose rather than genuine scrutiny; Albanese's office declined to comment.

Insights

Did the Prime Minister's office secretly rewrite Australia's AI rules to favor big tech over local creators?
Why were crucial warnings about genetic synthesis and creator rights quietly erased from a major parliamentary AI letter?