Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 19
Supreme Court Revives Race-in-Admissions Fight With 4 Maryland Middle Schools 3 Years After 2023 Ruling
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 19

Supreme Court Revives Race-in-Admissions Fight With 4 Maryland Middle Schools 3 Years After 2023 Ruling

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Oct 19

Summary

  • Montgomery County’s 4 selective public middle schools will be at the center of a new Supreme Court test of how far schools can go to diversify admissions without explicitly using race.
  • A group of mostly Asian American parents sued after the district changed its admissions criteria, arguing the revised rules unlawfully disadvantaged Asian American students.
  • The case returns the justices to the issue 3 years after their 2023 decision striking down race-conscious admissions at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, while leaving unresolved race-neutral diversity policies.
  • The court had recently turned away similar challenges from Virginia and West Point, but at least 4 justices voted to hear this one; arguments are set for next year, with a ruling due by late June or early July.

Insights

Can parents prove a school system intentionally discriminated if the targeted students were actually admitted at higher rates than they applied?
If a school admission lottery is officially colorblind, could it still be an illegal tool for hidden racial balancing?
Why does a 160-year-old federal tax law still make distilling whiskey at home a crime while brewing beer is perfectly legal?