Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 19
Supreme Court Rejects 9/11 Plea Deal for 3 Defendants, Clearing Path to Death Penalty Trial
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 19

Supreme Court Rejects 9/11 Plea Deal for 3 Defendants, Clearing Path to Death Penalty Trial

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Oct 19

Summary

  • Monday’s unsigned order left intact the cancellation of plea agreements for Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and two other Sept. 11 defendants, exposing them again to a possible capital trial.
  • The men had asked the justices to restore 2024 deals that would have imposed life sentences in exchange for waiving appeals after nearly 3,000 people were killed in the attacks.
  • Lloyd Austin scrapped those agreements within days of their approval, and a federal appeals court later upheld his authority to revoke them; the Supreme Court gave no reasoning and noted Justice Brett Kavanaugh did not participate.
  • The ruling keeps the long-delayed Guantánamo military commission case on track toward a 2028 trial instead of a negotiated resolution.

Insights

Will the Supreme Court's rejection of the 9/11 plea deals finally bring justice, or just decades more of legal gridlock over CIA torture?
How will the admissibility of deeply tainted interrogation evidence threaten the long-awaited 2028 trial of the accused 9/11 masterminds?
Does the cancellation of guaranteed life sentences for 9/11 suspects risk a complete collapse of their prosecution due to compromised evidence?