Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 21
Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Revive 500-Mile Border Wall Plan
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 21

Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Revive 500-Mile Border Wall Plan

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Oct 21

Summary

  • An emergency filing on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to let border wall construction resume in southwest Texas after a federal judge blocked work in the Big Bend region.
  • Judge Kathleen Cardone ruled on Oct. 2 that the administration likely exceeded its authority by waiving environmental and other laws to speed construction, then refused Tuesday to pause that order.
  • Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices the injunction is “baseless” and would leave a 300-plus-mile gap in border defenses vulnerable to cartels and other crossings.
  • A river guide, church preservation group, environmental group and local landowners sued in April over a plan covering more than 500 miles of the Mexico border, including sections in Big Bend National Park.
  • The case now puts the administration’s border-security push against local environmental and constitutional objections, with the justices not yet setting a briefing schedule.

Insights

How will the Supreme Court balance border security needs against the irreversible ecological damage to the Big Bend region's unique landscapes?
What long-term precedent might the Supreme Court set regarding executive power to bypass environmental laws for major infrastructure projects?
Could advanced surveillance technology provide a less destructive alternative to physical barriers in rugged, low-traffic border areas like Big Bend?