Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 25
Appeals Court Questions Trump Bid to Void 20,000 California Mail Ballots
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 25

Appeals Court Questions Trump Bid to Void 20,000 California Mail Ballots

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Oct 25

Summary

  • Two of three appellate judges signaled strong skepticism at a Sunday hearing over the Trump administration’s request to force California to set aside roughly 20,000 mail ballots allegedly sent to noncitizens.
  • Justice Department lawyer Matthew Donnelly offered few specifics, saying the government relied on a voter list bought by an unnamed third party and matched it with federal citizenship data using third-party software.
  • Judge Mark J. Bennett, a Trump appointee, pressed whether election officials could lawfully disqualify voters without “extraordinary proof,” faulting the administration for asking the court to accept its claims without district-court fact-finding.
  • A Los Angeles election systems worker warned in a sworn statement that trying to filter the flagged ballots now could have a “catastrophic impact” on election operations, underscoring the case’s stakes with midterms nine days away.

Insights

How will courts define the extraordinary proof required for federal intervention in state-managed election operations?
If late-stage verification requests risk system failure, when is the optimal time to secure voter rolls?