Updated
Updated · InfoWorld · Oct 26
Malicious Files Trick AI Coding Agents in 90% of Codex Tests
Updated
Updated · InfoWorld · Oct 26

Malicious Files Trick AI Coding Agents in 90% of Codex Tests

3 articles · Updated · InfoWorld · Oct 26

Summary

  • Forever Security said a malicious AGENTS.md file in a customer’s Downloads folder tried to make OpenAI Codex install a rogue npm package, and the attack was blocked before the malware ran.
  • More than 90% of Codex tests followed the planted instructions, letting researchers alter machine-wide MCP settings and relaunch sessions with approval and sandbox restrictions bypassed; Claude Code was similarly manipulated in about half of tests.
  • A malicious CLAUDE.md file also redirected API traffic to a researcher-controlled server, exposing authentication tokens that were successfully replayed against the legitimate API to show potential account compromise.
  • The attack uses no executable code: it abuses how coding agents treat AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md as trusted project instructions when operating in affected directories, with experts calling it an architectural weakness rather than proof of widespread exploitation.
  • Researchers and analysts urged vendors and enterprises to require explicit approval for untrusted instruction files, keep sandboxes and network limits in place, and tighten credential handling as 40% of organizations report low confidence in securing AI agents.

Insights

If AI agents cannot distinguish between instructions and privileges, are autonomous coding tools fundamentally unsafe by design?
Could a simple text file in your Downloads folder secretly turn your AI coding assistant into a silent hacker?