Updated
Updated · The Washington Post · Oct 27
Supreme Court Lets Trump Restrict 360,000-Case Deportation Closure Policy
Updated
Updated · The Washington Post · Oct 27

Supreme Court Lets Trump Restrict 360,000-Case Deportation Closure Policy

3 articles · Updated · The Washington Post · Oct 27

Summary

  • An unsigned Supreme Court order on Tuesday rejected an appeal by Baltimore, Columbus, New Haven and an immigrant-rights group, leaving in place a ruling blocking a Biden-era policy on administrative closure.
  • That clears the way for the Trump administration to stop immigration judges from using the tool to close deportation cases without dismissing them, meaning many cases could now be reopened.
  • The practice, codified by the Biden administration in 2024, has been used in some form for decades and has granted administrative closure to roughly 360,000 migrants since 1990.
  • Supporters say it helps overloaded immigration courts and protects migrants such as crime victims or neglected juveniles with strong claims to stay; critics call it backdoor amnesty.
  • The case arose after Trump returned to office, declined to defend the 2024 rule and backed Texas' challenge, which produced a permanent injunction now left intact.

Insights

Why did the Supreme Court let a nationwide block on administrative closure stand, and can older legal pathways still keep some cases paused?
If immigration judges lose a decades-old tool to pause deportation cases, what happens to vulnerable migrants and already overloaded courts?