Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Nov 1
Social Security Email Praises Trump Days Before Midterms, Risking 87-Year-Old Hatch Act Breach
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Nov 1

Social Security Email Praises Trump Days Before Midterms, Risking 87-Year-Old Hatch Act Breach

2 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Nov 1

Summary

  • Friday and Saturday emails from the Social Security Administration told online account holders that under President Donald J. Trump, the agency was becoming a “model of excellence” days before the midterm elections.
  • Several legal experts said the praise and timing could violate the 87-year-old Hatch Act, which bars executive-branch employees from using their positions to influence partisan elections.
  • Kathleen Clark said the message looked like propaganda rather than a public-service notice, while Richard Painter said it appeared designed to persuade voters that Trump was doing a good job.
  • The email also echoed a Trump administration television ad campaign this fall that promoted his presidency and drew similar Hatch Act concerns; the agency did not immediately comment.

Insights

Where is the legal line drawn between a routine government performance update and a prohibited campaign message under the Hatch Act?
What are the actual penalties for federal agencies if taxpayer-funded emails are officially deemed a violation of government ethics rules?