Updated
Updated · Hubbis · Nov 4
Richard Grasby Urges Specialist Input for Cross-Border Wealth Advice as Hong Kong Eyes Family-Office Role
Updated
Updated · Hubbis · Nov 4

Richard Grasby Urges Specialist Input for Cross-Border Wealth Advice as Hong Kong Eyes Family-Office Role

2 articles · Updated · Hubbis · Nov 4

Summary

  • At a 28 October Hong Kong forum, Appleby partner Richard Grasby said advisers to complex international families stand out by knowing when to bring in specialists—or decline work entirely—rather than forcing a one-stop solution.
  • One example was a proposed Cayman trust for a family with US links: after checking the US consequences, Grasby said he turned down the assignment because of a potentially adverse tax outcome on the settlor’s death.
  • Fees, he argued, should be tied to clearly defined scope and assumptions, because an early estimate can harden into a client expectation even when the work later expands beyond the original brief.
  • Stable teams are another differentiator, he said, since continuity spares families from repeatedly disclosing sensitive personal details and preserves context behind earlier planning decisions.
  • For Hong Kong, Grasby said headline counts of family offices matter less than the wider ecosystem—trusts, funds, philanthropy and holding structures—that supports cross-border family arrangements.

Insights

Why did a top adviser reject a lucrative Cayman trust deal, and what does it reveal about hidden cross-border tax traps?
Beyond technical skills, why is the simple act of declining a wealthy client becoming the ultimate mark of a top-tier financial adviser?