Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Nov 12
Guantánamo Judges Throw Out 9/11 Confessions After 183 Waterboardings
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Nov 12

Guantánamo Judges Throw Out 9/11 Confessions After 183 Waterboardings

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Nov 12

Summary

  • Military judges at Guantánamo Bay have excluded all key confessions in the Sept. 11 death-penalty cases, a major blow to efforts to bring the accused plotters to trial 25 years after the attacks.
  • CIA torture drove the rulings: Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times, stripped naked and subjected to rectal abuse, while interrogators held detainees in years of secret, lawyerless confinement.
  • The judges found that coercion tainted the statements at the center of the prosecution, leaving the military court still struggling to build admissible cases against men accused in the 2001 attacks.
  • The decisions underscore how post-9/11 policies adopted under President George W. Bush still shape the unresolved quest for justice in a case that killed thousands and transformed U.S. security policy.

Insights

How can prosecutors secure a conviction for the 9/11 attacks when the most crucial evidence is permanently erased by past interrogations?
Could alternative evidence bypass the tainted confessions, or is the entire military commission case doomed to remain stalled indefinitely?
Will the families of 9/11 victims ever see justice, or has the pursuit of intelligence permanently destroyed the chance for a trial?