Dorit Kemsley rejected Paul "PK" Kemsley’s claims that her spending worsened the family’s finances, saying he has enough money to cover the child and spousal support she is seeking.
An email PK allegedly sent two months after their split warned that current expenses were "not sustainable" and accused Dorit of ignoring their "precarious financial situation" while making financial demands on him.
PK also said Dorit was limiting his time with their children while she filmed, but Dorit countered that she has cared for the kids most of the time.
The dispute adds to an increasingly public divorce battle that already drew scrutiny after reports their home had neared foreclosure before PK made payments to stop it.
Is Dorit Kemsley overspending, or is PK using a financial crisis narrative to gain leverage over support, custody, and their nearly foreclosed home?
If wardrobe costs were tied to Bravo filming and many items were returned, where does personal luxury end and professional expense begin in this split?