Can millions in hidden outside spending completely flip a local election where the frontrunner previously led by over twenty points?

Question

Accepted Answer

Yes, it can narrow a race sharply and, in some cases, flip it, but a complete reversal from a 20-point deficit is still hard and far from certain. The evidence in this California contest cuts both ways. Aisha Wahab has already beaten Melissa Hernandez twice by more than 20 points, including in the June special election, where official Alameda County results showed Wahab at about 42.8% and Hernandez at 16.8% in a large field. The district is also strongly Democratic, and Wahab has the state party endorsement. Those are real structural advantages that are not easy to erase with advertising alone. But the scale of outside spending is unusually large for a low-turnout summer runoff. AIPAC-linked and allied groups have poured more than $5 million into ads backing Hernandez and attacking Wahab, while outside support for Wahab has been much smaller. In a special election with roughly 430,000 registered voters and turnout likely far below a presidential cycle, that level of spending can dominate the information environment, boost name recognition, and move undecided or low-information voters. The biggest unknown is timing and turnout. Much of this spending arrived after Wahab built her earlier margins, and some of it may not have been fully reflected in those prior results. Low-turnout runoffs are more volatile than broad primaries. So the answer is: possible, but not proven. Money can absolutely tighten the race and sometimes produce an upset, especially in a sleepy special electio…

Aipac-Linked Super PACs Pour $5 Million Into California House Runoff Against Wahab

Sources

Sources

Aipac-Linked Super PACs Pour $5 Million Into California House Runoff Against Wahab

Summary

Sources

Insights

Related Stories

Sources

Related Stories