Updated
Updated · Deadline · Aug 11
California AG Bonta Backs Structural Fixes in $111 Billion Paramount-WBD Suit
Updated
Updated · Deadline · Aug 11

California AG Bonta Backs Structural Fixes in $111 Billion Paramount-WBD Suit

3 articles · Updated · Deadline · Aug 11

Summary

  • Rob Bonta said California would consider settling the Paramount-WBD antitrust case only through structural remedies, rejecting behavioral promises such as David Ellison’s pledge to release 30 films a year.
  • The attorney general said enforceable fixes would keep certain corporate entities separate in the challenged markets, while calling the 30-film commitment an “old stale promise” that would not solve competition concerns.
  • Set for trial in March, the lawsuit seeks to block the $111 billion merger on grounds it would harm competition in wide-release films, blockbuster films and cable programming.
  • Bonta also rejected divesting CNN as a remedy and denied Ellison camp claims that the case is politically driven to stop CBS News and CNN from coming under the Ellisons.
  • His comments came hours after reports that Ellison plans to begin moving Paramount out of California on Oct. 1 if the AG’s office does not open settlement talks by then.

Insights

Could a threat to pull a historic studio out of California force the state to compromise on its antitrust crusade?
With a massive daily ticking fee looming, will Paramount dismantle its empire to save the $111 billion mega-merger?