Updated
Updated · NBC Boston · Aug 16
Massachusetts Child-Safety Law Faces Scrutiny in Lindsay Clancy Trial Over 3 Killings
Updated
Updated · NBC Boston · Aug 16

Massachusetts Child-Safety Law Faces Scrutiny in Lindsay Clancy Trial Over 3 Killings

3 articles · Updated · NBC Boston · Aug 16

Summary

  • Retired Judge Carol Erskine said testimony in the Lindsay Clancy trial has exposed gaps in how Massachusetts law protects children when a parent shows signs of a mental health crisis.
  • Erskine said state commitment law does not require a suicide plan for hospitalization, arguing the standard is a "likelihood of serious harm" and that clinicians should assess broader suicide risk.
  • Mental health providers are mandated reporters, she said, and could have involved the Department of Children and Families to build a safety plan or seek temporary custody with relatives.
  • The debate has widened beyond Clancy's postpartum-psychosis defense to whether hospitals, crisis lines and child-welfare authorities missed chances to intervene before the deaths of her 3 children.

Insights

Did fatal flaws in mandated reporting and psychiatric commitment laws inadvertently pave the way for this devastating family tragedy?
Where is the legal line between a tragic psychotic break and calculated murder when a parent is in crisis?
Could a mother's desperate online searches for mental health help actually be used to prove she planned the unthinkable?