Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Aug 28
Rhode Island Bans Grocery Covenants, Targeting Food Deserts Affecting 37% of Woonsocket
Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Aug 28

Rhode Island Bans Grocery Covenants, Targeting Food Deserts Affecting 37% of Woonsocket

3 articles · Updated · The Guardian · Aug 28

Summary

  • Rhode Island in July became the second state to ban new grocery restrictive covenants, which chains use to block rivals from selling food in vacated stores for years or decades.
  • In Woonsocket, the issue is acute: 45,000 residents have one full-service supermarket, 37% are food insecure, and at least three covenants limit reuse of former Stop & Shop and Walmart sites.
  • The law is not retroactive, so existing restrictions remain until they expire; one Woonsocket site is tied up until 2034, while a Richmond property vacant for 30 years can now be re-leased without a new covenant.
  • Independent grocers say the ban could open more viable sites, but financing still blocks expansion—one planned Woonsocket store has seen projected costs jump from $3 million-$4 million to more than double that.
  • The measure is part of a broader push spreading from cities to states, with California weighing a stronger retroactive ban and U.S. senators asking the FTC to examine federal action.

Insights

With new laws ignoring past deeds, how will residents survive a corporate-made food desert while existing locks remain until 2034?
Why are corporate giants legally allowed to starve a city of 45,000 by locking away vacant supermarkets for decades?
Could the secret to defeating corporate-created food deserts lie not in new legislation, but in hyper-local community gardens and school pantries?