Updated
Updated · Fox News · Sep 9
McKenna West Asks Supreme Court to Block June 22 Custody Ruling Over Medically Fragile Baby
Updated
Updated · Fox News · Sep 9

McKenna West Asks Supreme Court to Block June 22 Custody Ruling Over Medically Fragile Baby

3 articles · Updated · Fox News · Sep 9

Summary

  • An emergency application filed Wednesday asks Justice Elena Kagan to freeze a Los Angeles ruling that made a California couple the legal parents of a baby born Aug. 12 with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
  • West says that June 22 order — later upheld by a Texas judge on Sept. 2 — shut her out of the case, leaving her unable to receive updates or defend an order requiring continued life-saving treatment.
  • Her lawyers argue California lacked jurisdiction because West appeared only to contest it, not to litigate custody, and say treating her 147-page filing as consent raises a broader constitutional question.
  • The dispute began after a 20-week scan found the heart defect and West says the intended parents asked her to abort; the newborn has since undergone one of three expected open-heart surgeries and was later returned to a breathing tube.

Insights

When a surrogate and intended parents clash over a newborn's life-or-death surgeries, who legally decides the child's ultimate fate?
Can a surrogacy contract force a woman to choose between a $250,000 penalty and aborting a baby she wants to save?
Does fighting an out-of-state custody battle automatically trap you in that court's jurisdiction, stripping away your legal rights?