Updated
Updated · CNBC · Sep 28
Judge Voids FEMA Rule Withholding 20% of Counterterrorism Funds Over Election Changes
Updated
Updated · CNBC · Sep 28

Judge Voids FEMA Rule Withholding 20% of Counterterrorism Funds Over Election Changes

3 articles · Updated · CNBC · Sep 28

Summary

  • U.S. District Judge Amir Ali vacated FEMA’s June rule that threatened to withhold 20% of state counterterrorism grants unless states and some cities changed election procedures.
  • Ali said FEMA exceeded its authority because the grant conditions targeted routine election administration and the agency failed to show how they would prevent terrorist attacks.
  • The rule demanded hand-marked paper ballots instead of barcode or QR-based systems, manual audits of 5% of ballots, voter-roll citizenship checks, and citizenship verification for poll workers and vendors.
  • Counties in Texas and Tennessee and Columbus, Ohio, sued in August, arguing the policy put tens of millions of dollars in public-safety funding at risk and intruded on state control of elections.
  • The ruling is the latest court setback for Trump administration efforts to use federal power to press election-policy changes, while the Justice Department declined comment.

Insights

Why did a judge stop FEMA from tying anti-terror grants to election changes, and what does it mean for emergency preparedness nationwide?
Could local governments still face new election-related conditions on public safety grants, or did this ruling draw a hard legal line?