Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 14
NFL Model Ranks Rams No. 1, Questions 5-0 Vikings in Week 6
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Oct 14

NFL Model Ranks Rams No. 1, Questions 5-0 Vikings in Week 6

3 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Oct 14

Summary

  • No. 1 Los Angeles topped the projection model’s Week 6 rankings even after losing to Buffalo, diverging sharply from the human power list.
  • Fifth-hardest schedule and elite adjusted offensive metrics — including top-two early-down EPA and success rate — kept the Rams atop the model, with Myles Garrett’s expected return boosting the outlook.
  • The 5-0 Vikings drew the model’s biggest skepticism: it rated them roughly average because their offense ranks in the bottom third despite the league’s easiest schedule and strong field position.
  • Houston’s 1-4 record also looked misleading to the model, which viewed the Texans as roughly comparable to Minnesota thanks to a top-five defense and expected offensive help from Nico Collins and Marvin Harrison Jr.
  • The model also pushed back on any Giants optimism, citing bottom-10 offensive production, bottom-five run defense and Brian Burns’ season-ending absence.

Insights

Why does a sophisticated computer model rank a struggling 1-4 Rams team higher than the undefeated 5-0 Vikings?
Can underlying efficiency metrics truly predict NFL success better than actual win-loss records during the early season?
How do missing star players warp early data, and could that explain the massive gap between human and computer rankings?