Updated
Updated · Tom's Guide · Oct 17
Apple Watch Ultra 4 Ties Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 in 13.1-Mile Half Marathon Test
Updated
Updated · Tom's Guide · Oct 17

Apple Watch Ultra 4 Ties Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 in 13.1-Mile Half Marathon Test

3 articles · Updated · Tom's Guide · Oct 17

Summary

  • A side-by-side half marathon test found Apple Watch Ultra 4 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 delivered near-identical race tracking, with no clear winner on core fitness accuracy.
  • GPS results were almost even: Apple logged 13.23 miles and Samsung 13.21 miles on the 13.1-mile course, with both hitting auto-lap markers closely and slight overages attributed to normal race-line drift.
  • Heart-rate tracking was similarly close against an Oura Ring 5 baseline of 163 bpm, with Apple averaging 159 bpm and Samsung 160 bpm during a run spent mostly in zones 4 and 5.
  • Samsung's elevation reading also held up better than some earlier testing suggested, recording 342 feet versus the course's official 311 feet, while both watches remained usable in-race thanks to physical buttons and bright screens.
  • The practical choice comes down more to ecosystem and price than performance: Apple costs $799 and requires an iPhone, while Samsung costs $699 and works only with Android or Galaxy phones.

Insights

If Apple and Samsung's top smartwatches tie in performance, is ecosystem lock-in the only thing keeping you from switching sides?
Can these premium smartwatches truly replace dedicated running gear, or are serious athletes still better off sticking with Garmin?