House House Admits Under 0.1% AI Code in Big Walk as IGF Jurors Reject Any Use
Updated
Updated · The Verge · Nov 10
House House Admits Under 0.1% AI Code in Big Walk as IGF Jurors Reject Any Use
1 articles · Updated · The Verge · Nov 10
Summary
House House said well under 0.1% of Big Walk’s code came from LLM responses, used late in development to tackle technical bugs and third-party code issues.
IGF jurors had just published a statement saying they would not vote for games using generative AI in any capacity, citing harmful effects and a sharp rise in AI-assisted entries.
Big Walk’s studio said it disclosed the usage in its IGF submission but not on Steam, arguing the platform does not ask for chatbot or code-use disclosures.
House House apologized, said it lacked an AI policy during development, and pledged to create a more comprehensive one as the indie game community fights over AI boundaries.